Animal Welfare Approved

Prev Next

A Bit of Dirt a Day Keeps the Doctor Away

February 3, 2010 on 10:41 am | By Andrew in Featured Farmer, Food Labels, Food Safety, Nutrition, The Big Picture 7 Comments

AWA MAE Farms PigletsMost people have heard the old saying “a bit of dirt never hurt anyone.” When my kids were little and they dropped a piece of apple on the floor, I would run it under the tap for a second or two before passing it back to them for a (usually unsuccessful) second attempt to eat it. I did it almost without thinking–instinctively perhaps. And I remember my parents doing the same for me–and no doubt my grandparents did exactly the same for my parents when they were young.

Of course, the underlying principle here arguably has its roots in basic human biology: the more germs we are exposed to when we are younger, the stronger our immune systems are in later life. And this very same principle extends to the way many of us choose to farm.

Animal Welfare Approved farmers know that allowing animals to behave naturally and providing them with a low-stress environment helps to maintain their natural immune systems–their so-called “positive health.” And by working with nature, and not against her, we know that exposing stock to low levels of disease or internal parasite challenges in their early lives–as opposed to routinely using non-therapeutic medicines–will help to produce robust animals with vigor and resilience who only need veterinary treatments for disease or injury.

Over the last decade or two, however, this commonsense principle has been largely swept aside at both the home and the farm, as our ongoing war against Mother Nature entered a new “biological” phase. With the seemingly endless supply of powerful medicines and plentiful sanitation products, our healthy respect for the unseen bacteria around us rapidly developed into an obsession with hygiene and cleanliness at both home and on the farm. We sprayed and wiped our homes in order to kill “99% of known household germs,” while our intensive farmers used copious amounts of antibiotics to achieve ever higher levels of productivity and prevent the inevitable outbreak of disease among the closely confined animals on their holdings.

Of course, we are now rapidly learning of the hidden costs of this naive pursuit to eradicate or dominate the microbial world. As many of us suspected, excessive day-to-day domestic hygiene practices have been linked directly with the recent boom in allergies in developed countries, as our children’s immune systems are threatened. Similarly, our attempts to control disease outbreaks in Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) through the routine use of antibiotics is leading to the emergence of antibiotic resistant diseases which now present a very real threat to human health.

Scientists are discovering that our relationship with the bacteria around us –and inside us–is much more complex than we first thought. Indeed, animal researchers in the UK have now established a direct link between exposure to bacteria in early in life and the reduction of allergies and other autoimmune diseases later on. They tested three groups of piglets:  one raised in an outdoor environment, another raised in an indoor environment, and the third reared in an isolated environment (where they were fed antibiotics daily). After examining their gut tissues and faeces at different growth stages, the scientists found that the outdoor pigs quickly developed communities of “friendly” bacteria in their guts which then helped them develop healthy immune systems later in life. They found that 90% of bacteria in the gut of outdoor piglets were species known for their health promoting effects and for their ability to minimize intestinal pathogens, such as E. coli and salmonella. In contrast, “friendly” bacteria made up less than 70% and less than 50% of the gut flora of the indoor pigs and isolated bred pigs, respectively. The researchers also found the differences in gut microbial communities affected the piglets’ immune systems, with the outdoor pigs able to respond more appropriately and effectively to disease challenge. It now appears that exposure to dirt during a pig’s early life actually plays an important part in the development of its natural immunity.

Of course, I am not suggesting a return to the “Dark Ages” for farming, nor a regular diet of fresh soil for our kids. But the emerging science around these issues is now raising important questions about what we really mean by good health and hygiene at home and on the farm. And this new research also represents a small but important step in establishing the scientific facts behind the wide-ranging benefits of grass-based outdoor farming systems. Because it’s not all just “mud and magic.”


RSS Facebook ReTweet Animal Welfare Approved on Twitter Animal Welfare Approved on My Space SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Prev Next

7 Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. So very, very true.

    Claire Ballard

    Comment by Claire Ballard — February 6, 2010 #

  2. excellent post!

    Comment by Angela Shintani-Sandrowicz — February 6, 2010 #

  3. Non-therapeutic antibiotics are bad for a variety of reasons, but scientific research, the last time I checked has *NOT* found clear evidence that the following is true:

    ” the more germs we are exposed to when we are younger, the stronger our immune systems are in later life.”

    Once you become infected with germs, your body recognizes *that same kind of germ* if you are infected again and helps you ward off that particular infection. That’s a very far cry from making your whole immune system “stronger.” Exposing kids to more germs is a way to make them sick young to save them from getting that same infection when they are older, in some cases. In other cases, it’s a way to give the gift of parasites and other scary consequences:… See More

    http://thebeautifulbrain.com/2010/02/psyche-parasites/

    Comment by Kim Connolly — February 6, 2010 #

  4. I agree with Kim…

    Comment by Anca Elena Toma — February 6, 2010 #

  5. I disagree with Kim! There is a ton of evidence that some exposure to germs is beneficial! Here’s a couple articles I found:

    http://kidshealth.org/parent/general/body_basics/immune.html#

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/health/27brod.html?_r=1

    Comment by Michelle Maestas — February 6, 2010 #

  6. ok Kim – parasites are not being touted /considered beneficial bacteria the way I read this article…. & I do agree with the article: early (but not reckless) exposure to many common bacteria are beneficial for challenging the immune system and building up a wider repertoire to fight against future exposures – IT IS THE BASIC PRINCIPLE OF VACCINES… See More …. I was raised in a different country, immigrated here 17 years ago, astounded by the amount of asthma/allergy issues that the average american child ( now adult) faces compared with children from other countries/cultures.
    I definitely attribute this to the ultra-clean obsession of many well-meaning parents. As a parent and as a health care professional I want to do right by my child, but keeping him encased in a surgically sanitary bubble (while it sounds wonderful) is not good for his development.
    Your first statement “Non-therapeutic antibiotics are bad for a variety of reasons, but scientific research, the last time I checked has *NOT* found clear evidence that the following is …” makes no sense.
    This article talks about environmental bacteria, and how low-level exposure over time helps us (human & animal) build a more robust resistance to other more aggressive strains of bacteria that may be evolved from these simpler strains. You seem to be referring to the indescriminate use of antibiotics for viral infections that will run their course and abate with the tincture of time. There is little disagreement that MRSA is the direct result of this… there is soo much more I could say on this, but will restrict myself – I’m sure you get the picture.

    Comment by Theresa Campbell Naude — February 6, 2010 #

  7. There is SO much evidence, and there are SO many studies, showing the benefit of exposure to germs/bacteria/dirt. There are even studies proving that the babies of women spending time on-farm while pregnant have significantly decreased risk of developing asthma, eczema, etc. I’m a very proud AWA farmer, and even more proud to be the mother of a … See Morebeautiful 15-month-old boy. I was happily feeding our hogs and chickens until I was so pregnant I couldn’t lift the water buckets, and have been taking my baby along for barn chores (leaving the care of the hogs to my husband) in a sling since he was a few months old. Needless to say, you won’t find many sanitized surfaces in my home, and all the evidence – scientific, anecdotal, and that from old wives – helps me believe I am providing a wonderfully healthy upbringing for my son. Thanks AWA for helping to increase awareness of the benefits of a naturally healthy lifestyle.

    Comment by Sophie Purdy Meili — February 6, 2010 #

Leave a comment





1007 Queen Street | Alexandria, VA 22314 | Tel: 202-546-5292 (5AWA) | Fax: 202-446-2151
© 2010 Animal Welfare Approved. All rights reserved.