The Logical Line in the Middle: Animal Welfare
July 16, 2009 on 8:18 am | By Andrew in Agricultural Policy, Environment, Factory Farms, Family Farms, Nutrition, The Big Picture 2 CommentsA recent article in The Gothernburg Times caught my eye, Animal welfare activists threaten nation’s agriculture.
Excuse me?
Drawing largely on the platform of the industry-supported Alliance for the Future of Agriculture in Nebraska (A-FAN), the author presents us with two options:
1) shore up agriculture as is – meaning the large factory farms that currently supply us with most of our animal protein, or
2) a vegan utopia in which animals are afforded the same rights as people, and pigs are treated like puppies.
Other articles (Farmers, activists at odds over animal treatment; Michigan’s 2 competing animal welfare proposals) echo this sentiment. A-FAN’s field director says that the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is, “working to create a vegetarian society,” pointing out that less than 4% of their budget goes to regional animal shelters with the majority going to lobbying. He goes on to say, “Animal agriculture is too important to [Nebraska] to allow organizations like HSUS to take it away from us.”
I would like to propose an alternative to this dichotomy. I believe it is possible to raise farm animals in outdoor systems that are truly based on animal welfare – not merely on providing the bare essentials and subtherapeautic antibiotics. Our current dependence on factory farming has left us with more than just so-called cheap food. What we save in the store we are paying out the back end in polluted groundwater, tainted meat, rampant animal cruelty, antibiotic-resistant pathogens and and long-term health and wellness issues. High-welfare, pasture-based farms offer an alternative to this scenario, and are by no means a threat to agriculture; in fact, they may indeed provide the solution.
The farmers in the Animal Welfare Approved program adhere to standards of humane husbandry that take into account the animals’ natural behaviors. Pigs wallow, hens forage and scratch, and cows graze – all freedoms which are denied to most farm animals. As long as we limit our discussion to the merits of factory farming vs. veganism, we ignore the logical line in the middle: animal husbandry that is healthy, safe, environmentally responsible and humane. We know this is possible because the farmers in our program do it every day.
2 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI








It’s refreshing to hear voices of reason on this divisive subject. I work at the HSUS and the “logical middle” is exactly where we were aiming with Proposition 2 in California, a ballot measure to ensure that laying hens, pregnant sows, and calves raised for veal have enough room to stand up, turn around, and extend their limbs.
Freedom of movement is such a basic quality-of-life issue, yet the debate often centered around veganism vs. meat eating.
It’s simple: all animals deserve to be treated humanely, even those raised for food.
Comment by Hillary — July 24, 2009 #
Thanks for your comment Hillary, it is high praise indeed. The heart of our program is just that – that all animals must be treated humanely. We support farms raising animals outdoors in high-welfare systems, and are extremely proud of the farmers who work hard to meet our standards. We will continue to provide an option for those looking for meat, dairy and eggs from animals raised with compassion, and to be a resource in the agricultural community.
Thanks,
Andrew
Comment by Andrew — July 24, 2009 #